A 03-03-2014 10:55, Matthias Kirschner escrigué:
Joinup has a summary from discussion about software patents:
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor/news/software-patents-should-include-source-code

Next week I will be in a panel discussion with the European Patent
Office at Cebit, and I am interested in your opinion about the article.

Regards,
Matthias

I know many people don't understand or agree with this basic epistemology, but software is immaterial. It's more or less what they mean when they say it's "thought". What software is has nothing to do with any physical force, magnitude or matter. The same that any software says (and therefore does, because a program is just an explanation on how to solve a problem with a computer) is maintained if you change
all physical details of support or computer running it.

A patent is a deal whereas society (we all) give away our freedom to commerce on an invention in exchange for information about an invention (that otherwise we assume ther would not exist or would not be public). You keep the exclusive use of your
invention if you give away all relevant information on the invention.

Inventions have never in Europe included software. Inventions are physical, material, are methods of using forces of nature to your benefits. If you try to force software to be regarded as an invention you reach a fundamental contradiction, because software is information, you can't make the invention be information, so now the deal is : You keep the exclusive use your information if you give away all relevant information on
the information.

The contradiction appears clearly. Either you publish the relevant information (source open)
and don't patent or you patent without disclosing anythign meaningful
Software patents will never have full disclosure . The patent system is inconsistent applied to software. Economic or political opinion does not matter. It's essentially flawed, not
amtter anyone's colorful ideas.




_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to