Hi all,
Am 29.07.2014 14:14, schrieb Garreau, Alexandre:
Le 29/07/2014 à 13h31, Werner Koch a écrit :
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:09, [email protected] said:
For exemple, a Debian *OS* is *by default* fully free, but Debian
*project* (or at least people too close to it) often encourage you to
install proprietary software, notably through nonfree repository, where
Right, I am one of those who would encourage on pragmatic reasons to use
the non-free repository to install documentation for most GNU
software.
Well, a repository for non-free documentation would be better, since
documentation hasn’t to be as free as functional software (for reasons
explained by FSF) and therefore doesn’t cause ethical problems, while
proprietary software does.
I wonder whether anyone believes in this, sorry.
I omitted the GFDL sad story deliberately, though, because it's really
just distracting.
Best wishes
Michael
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
