Sorry for the top post! El 31 de diciembre de 2014 00:30:56 GMT, "Andrés Muñiz Piniella" <[email protected]> escribió: >Hi Torsten et al., >
Sorry. This should be Bronger if you are German, right? As we have not personally met? >>My question is: Is there any material (slides, web pages, books, >>case studies, peer-reviewed articles) that help with promoting >>converting to an open-source model? Could you point me to it? >There are some papers comparing calc, gnumeric and excel. Seems to show >peer review of gnumeric with support of R project makes it a better >spreadsheet. Same gnu/octave vs matlab and others. > > Might be new papers now. > Also there was a europen free software conference with a published talk about funding for H2020. I think it was published in this mailing list. >>I work in a government-funded research facility. Over the past 6 >>years, we created in-house software for managing our research data. >>I was the primary responsible person for this project. Now, I'd >>like to see it being converted into an open-source project. GPL, >>GitHub, etc. >EU look for more open way of publishing I do not think that they would >like the money spent in H2020 be for a particular company. > >R&D papers are now gold or green preferably so CC or similar. If you >publish data analysis you should let others reproduce the results. And >comment how correct it is. Plus a refernce to the code is quicker than >describing it in a paper. > >Please Post on Gitoriuos as it is on this side of the Atlantic and not >propietary such as gitorious. > >>My boss does not rule it out straight away. But he likes to be >>convinced that it is a good move. He has only little idea about >>open-source software, licences and the like. By the way, we have no >>other "business plan" with this software. >Personal case: after using 5 different propietary scanning probe >microspe data analysis software and hitting brick wall with comments >such as "cannot put voltage on data as it is not our core business" i >now use gwyddion.net. I feel it is the defacto spm analysis software >i.e. industry standard and companies will problably ship it by default >with teir equipment. So the CMI are very visible now. > >Hope it helps. > >Andres > > > >El 30 de diciembre de 2014 20:30:56 GMT, Torsten Bronger ><[email protected]> escribió: >>Hi! >> >>I work in a government-funded research facility. Over the past 6 >>years, we created in-house software for managing our research data. >>I was the primary responsible person for this project. Now, I'd >>like to see it being converted into an open-source project. GPL, >>GitHub, etc. >> >>My boss does not rule it out straight away. But he likes to be >>convinced that it is a good move. He has only little idea about >>open-source software, licences and the like. By the way, we have no >>other "business plan" with this software. >> >>My question is: Is there any material (slides, web pages, books, >>case studies, peer-reviewed articles) that help with promoting >>converting to an open-source model? Could you point me to it? >> >>(I raised this question on a German FSF mailing list a couple of >>months ago but the responses did only contain personal opinions. >>While I agree with all of it, it does not help me.) >> >>Regards, >>Torsten Bronger. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
