On 10 February 2015 at 12:15, Max Mehl <[email protected]> wrote: > I also have both apps. In addition to Sam's list: > * Both have a similar performance in my tests > * LO Reader needs much more disk space than OO Reader > * OO Reader has some display problems with odt and ods files. For > example missing page headers or wrong width of spreadsheet columns. > * Vice versa I noticed no display bugs with LO Reader so far, even with > more complex documents > Hopefully the space requirements do not grow too much in future versions > of LO. If they can regulate that, it'll become a very good reader (and > editor) indeed.
Cutting the size down was one of the huge headaches in porting LO to Android. This work has been going on for *years* ... There's more interesting technical details here: http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2015-01-21-android-viewer.html Another effort is AndrOpenOffice, which is an Android port of Apache OpenOffice 3.4. It's not that great to use, but it does exist and work. - d. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
