On 11 August 2015 at 20:41, Alessandro Rubini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. But these arguments are hard to make, and hard to convey to the > public. > Hacker chats. I can't show these pages around and make > people consider my point about software freedom. You're right, we need a helpful response. It's started hitting the news. Page two of the Register story details the problem in a manner that may be helpful: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/oracle_anti_security_research_rant/?page=2 These stories comment on the blog post and the problems with it: http://www.zdnet.com/article/oracle-to-sinner-customers-reverse-engineering-is-a-sin-youd-better-pack-it-in/ http://thenextweb.com/opinion/2015/08/11/oracle-drinking-the-kool-aid/ http://www.channelweb.co.uk/crn-uk/news/2421524/oracle-blasted-over-reverse-engineering-crackdown There was also a lot of other coverage, mostly just noting with amazement that the post exists and is real. Hope this is useful :-) - d. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
