On 2016-03-01 07:56:18, Florian Snow wrote:
Thank you for that! I'm not trying to be picky, but is there are reason
caretakers has been split into two words?

Well, I thought it's more Wiki-Wordy..-ish...

> Please think of top level structures, categories and templates and set
> them up.

I'm happy to help with the migration, but I don't think we had enough
time to think about appropriate structures yet. We're still in a phase
of collecting ideas.

To be honest, your campaign came a little sudden to me. After the Wiki has degraded into such a bad shape over time I just started to take on the cleanup work on my own and you catched me when the stone was already rolling. Still in the right moment though.

By th way, I had an idea to edit the CSS to make the wiki look more like the FSFE front page. If this is a goal, then what would be the best way
of trying out those ideas?  I currently use stylish, but that is a bit
messy to debug.

With your fellowship account you can check out https://svn.fsfe.org/external-web/style_wiki.fsfe.org/

So far I've been very careful not to make the style dependent on any JavaScript, to override the python-based html-templates as little as possible, and to not use any extensive style libraries. I'm still updating the style occasionally, when I notice things that look odd (probably going to happen with image and calendar pages)

--
Paul Hänsch                     █▉            Webmaster, System-Hacker
                              █▉█▉█▉
Jabber: [email protected]    ▉▉     Free Software Foundation Europe

Attachment: pgpIYelcuPqL2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to