Hi, Paul Hänsch <[email protected]>, Tuesday, 1 March 2016, 13:27:12 CET: > Well, I thought it's more Wiki-Wordy..-ish...
I guess if you prefer that spelling, it's ok. It's a minor detail anyway. > To be honest, your campaign came a little sudden to me. I'm sorry we surprised you like that. I had heard you were working on an update to either the design or the software, but I didn't know you were working on reorganizing the content. Had I known that, I would have contacted you directly first. I like your suggestion in one of your other mails to not import categories at this point, but to instead import all pages to a category that essentially says "Fixme". That way, the new wiki would still be usable, but we could easily see which parts still need editing. In the meantime, I will collect some sensible categories. In your other mail, you also mentioned naming conventions as in "Category/Sausage and Category/Vegetable". Am I right in assuming that this is where the category page itself would be found? So I would put "CategoryVegetable" on a page to assign it to the category "vegetable", but if I want to call the category itself (for an overview of all pages in that category, for example), I would go to "Category/Vegetable"? Just checking because in the old wiki and in the draft set of standards, it says every category has to start with the word "Category". Happy hacking! Florian -- www: https://wiki.fsfe.org/Fellows/floriansnow █▉ e-mail: [email protected] █▉█▉█▉ xmpp: [email protected] ▉▉ _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
