On 14/02/2016 9:44 AM, Jim McLaren wrote:
Gavin, I've moved this to discussion. HF was right. I've no business posting
in devinfo. I hadn't posted before tonight for exactly that reason. However,
seeing others posting what I was thinking encouraged me, for which I apologise.
HF, I will now confine my posts to discussion, but will continue to lurk in
devinfo as I do actually learn a bit now and then :-)
With you here Jim, lets start a movement here :-)...come on guys all for one
etc etc..whoa betide any one who raises technical issues in this discussion :-)
It is just my opinion, I don't and probably never will write a line of
anything that will go into SME server.
Do we stay with the RH/CentOS base - Yes (some may differ)
Then tart up sme9 as has been suggested by John Crisp, use it to develop
changes/look/layout, as much as it will allow for easy carry over to sme10.
Introduce a new UI if that is also indicated, may I suggest going to far with
sme9 would end up being wasted efort in the long run, its a dead end street,
just like sme8 and our resource stocks are very limited.
What is needed going forward is getting a sme10 alpha out, nothing can be done
on its UI/S-M until then. As part of that discuss/vote/decide whatever on what
will drive the UI in sme10.
Simplistic, most definetly, still just my opinion from afar.
Terry
_______________________________________________
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected]
Searchable archive at https://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
