On 11/11/2010 08:24 PM, Mirko Vogt wrote: > I still think having the testing branch is a good idea, because > > a) I do not want to force people _not_ committing new features, ideas, > packages, etc. because the branch is "freezed" for the actual release. > > b) However I also do not want to fix stuff which got committed during > the merge-window which may lead into regressions - I want to concentrate > on fixing critical bugs during this merge-window > > I think that's the most elegant way.
understanding. :) -- Best Regards Xiangfu -- Qi RSS feed, http://en.qi-hardware.com/feed/rss20.xml -- _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
