S?bastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
> As it turned out, that piece of crap takes more than 256 clock cycles
> per byte for a rather simple buffer copy code...

Wow. Are they doing the equivalent of

        while (*dst != *src)
                (*dst)++;

?

> By the way, why is it always poor or stupid designs that make hackaday
> and all the buzz? I've read countless times about this J1, Plasma, another
> crappy AVR clone and ZPU.

Maybe they've found an efficient honey to vinegar ratio for their
PR efforts ? :-)

- Werner

_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to