>>>>> "Cristian" == Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas <[email protected]> >>>>> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:25:45PM +0100, David Kuehling wrote: >> http://mosquito.dyndns.tv/david/nanonote/gnuplot-linuxtrm-3d.png >> http://mosquito.dyndns.tv/david/nanonote/gnuplot-linuxtrm.png > How long it take to process and render this examples? I wonder if it > can do some fft and no die in the try Well, the 3D example takes some time to render. It's much faster if plotting with lines instead of polygons. The 2D example plots in no time. If you're looking for a quick plotting tool to use as visualization "plugin" for an applications you develop, gnuplot is not the best choice. Two reasons come to my mind: - Interface to other applications is ASCII based (via plot files or stdin stream). text->double conversion has a huge overhead, especially w/out FPU - Terminal management is done in a way that may fail when gnuplot is started in a pipe. That's the problem that Octave has. Reading from stdin and waiting for a keypress to change back to text-mode is not the right thing to do when started via popen(). In that case the PLplot library may be more appropriate. Need to get it work with svglib first, though. cheers, David -- GnuPG public key: http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~dvdkhlng/dk.gpg Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205 D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40
pgplgwp4iYWQP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
