ljones, thanks a lot for asking! It's great to see that we have so many Ben NanoNote users that trust us enough to give the Ya a chance too :-)
>From my hands though, don't expect a Ya NanoNote for at least another year. > Is it cancelled or is it still going ahead at all? How can an open project be canceled? We haven't opened up all parts of the Ben to a satisfying degree yet, which is a high priority for me. Absolutely going ahead. > Also has the spec been decided on at all (e.g. usb host, more ram, higher > res screen etc?). No. In general - the more performance the better, and the features you mention make perfect sense. See http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/Ya_NanoNote_Specs On the other hand, the actual features come out after determinining design complexity, manufacturability, price, continuity from NanoNote or Milkymist, etc. So - too early to tell now, I cannot make any promises. > Also did anyone ever manage to get rockbox to run on the nanonote? That'd be nice, it would probably be a lot of detail work to get it to work well though. Reminds me how much better software on the Ben can still get :-) BTW - Thanks a lot for buying a Ben! I understand it cannot replace your sansa fuze and n900 yet, but the *yet* is the thrilling part and for sure we want to make devices that can satisfy all our computing needs. It's pretty clear that we better not rely on Nokia, for example :-) (though I hope for things to improve there) Cheers, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
