On 10/15/2011 01:33 AM, kyak wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm not sure if it is a big problem to switch from 64 bit to 32 bit > on a buildhost, but i'm sure that it is vital important so that those > seeking to develop for Ben would be able to download SDK and kick > start using it independent of if they were running x86 or x64 host. >
Hi Kyak switch the buildhost from 64 to 32 will be some work. :( good news is I have a 32bit server which is only host my blog. I think better we build both 64bit and 32bit. (since the compile script file is pretty stable. I will test and report) > Secondly, the SDK tarball released now is 720+ Mb; 2.7 Gb when > unpacked. It includes all the binaries, including those that can be > used to repack (not rebuild) the original image. I suppose that it > makes sense to include the OpenWrt Toolchain in release as well > (CONFIG_MAKE_TOOLCHAIN). It is much smaller and, if it is 32 bit, it > can be used to build small programs for Ben promptly. the SDK tarball is almost twice size then before. so it is time we enable the TOOLCHAIN again. > > So what do you think about it? Xiangfu mentioned about the upcoming > release based on linux-3.1, i think it would be great to have these > at that time :) I will try to build both 64bit and 32bit in next few days. the linux version is 3.0 not 3.1 since the openwrt upstream is using the linux-3.0 now. their are a lot of generic patch on openwrt like: 'openwrt-xburst/target/linux/generic' I don't want touch them and focus on ben nanonote. so it is linux-3.0 in next release. :) thanks kyak xiangfu _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
