Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:30:26PM +0200, Wolfgang Spraul wrote: > We learnt and continue to learn so much, it's scary. The Ya NanoNote > will most likely be Milkymist SoC based. I will not work on another > Ingenic-based device, I don't believe in any magic between free software > culture and Ingenic anymore than I believe in that magic between free > software culture and Samsung.
Why?. Is there some problem between Ingenic and free software? > The mechanical needs to be done entirely differently, that is still > an area where we learn intensively. It's almost a sidenote now that > the electrical design will be - of course - entirely in a free tool, > leaving legacy behind as Werner would say :-) Which tool for the electrical design? Sorry for the questions if answers are obvious. I do not know. > a) continue to polish and refine the OpenWrt-based Ben NanoNote images > which will be our basis for lots of exciting hardware to come. About this: Why every few months you want to build openwrt for nanonote many packages are broken and do not build or fail?. Maybe I am wrong (I do not know anything about openwrt), but I read every few months a lot of things do not work and kyak and fantastic few contributions more need to fix a lot of things. Is this because openwrt people do not take care of those packages/recipes?. Or is this because many things are not in upstream?. It looks for me like a lot of work is made again and again all the time. Sounds like if you port every time a lot of things you did a time ago. Dont get me wrong. I just would like to understand why things break almost every few days or months. Thanks a lot for this community of free hardware and software. Rafa (one guy more who is a nanonote owner ) _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
