Replying to myself, >>>>> "David" == David Kuehling <[email protected]> writes:
> Looking here [1] I think the nanonote may be able to send router > solicitations directly from the Kernel, without any daemon required. > Though making the NanoNote a "router" is also somewhat ugly? > [1] http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/proc-sys-net-ipv6..html This doesn't help: Linux kernel can send out router *solicitations* but not router *advertisements* :/ Maybe we should configure nanonotes to use a fixed (static) link-local address. This can't break anything, as the address is link-local WRT the two-endpoint usb link anyways. And we gain access to the nanonote via a well-defined address that does not require any setup on the host (other than making sure usb0 interface is up). cheers, David -- GnuPG public key: http://dvdkhlng.users.sourceforge.net/dk.gpg Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205 D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40
pgphfhQpBQoGt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
