On Friday 14 September 2012, you wrote: > It would be fun to see how your 4tH performs in this environment > as compared to running directly on Ben NN. On a sufficiently > fast PC, my guess would be as good, maybe faster than Ben.
This is what bench/bench.4th returns: Platform OS Forth Compiler Cell Time -------- -- ----- -------- ------ ---- Spectrum 48K ZX-BASIC Artic Forth Z80 assembler 16 bit 53:50 mins Sun Sp Ultra1 Solaris 4tH V3.2 GCC 32 bit 0:18 mins RS/6000 250 AIX V3 4tH V3.2 XL C V1.3 32 bit 0:30 mins P5/600 DOS V5 4tH V3.3 DJGPP V2.72 32 bit 0:05 mins P5/600 Win 3.1 4tH V3.3 Turbo C++ V3.0 32 bit 0:06 mins P5/166 DOS V5 4tH V3.2 DJGPP V2.72 32 bit 0:09 mins P5/166 Win 3.1 4tH V3.2 Turbo C++ V3.0 32 bit 0:21 mins 486/33 DOS V5 4tH V3.2 Turbo C V2.0 32 bit 2:45 mins 486/33 DOS V5 4tH V3.2 DJGPP V2.72 32 bit 1:11 mins 486/33 DOS V5 FPC V3.55 8086 assembler 16 bit 0:29 mins 486/33 DOS V5 PFE V09.12 Unknown 32 bit 0:45 mins 486/33 DOS V5 CForth Turbo C V2.0 16 bit 11:26 mins 486/66 DOS V5 NIB Forth Unknown 16 bit 10:55 mins 486/66 Win V3.1 AtLast Turbo C++ V3.0 16 bit 5:08 mins 486/66 Win V3.1 4tH V3.2 Turbo C++ V3.0 32 bit 1:23 mins 486/66 DOS V5 CForth Turbo C V2.0 16 bit 5:45 mins 486/66 DOS V5 4tH V3.2 Turbo C V2.0 32 bit 1:22 mins THIS COMPUTER Unknown 4tH V3.61 Unknown 32 bit 0:03 mins root@BenNanoNote:~/4th# Try it on your own NanoNote and compare. Hans Bezemer -- Absolutely no trees were killed to produce this sig. Well, OK, we had to tie one up and torture it. That's it. Visit our website! http://thebeez.home.xs4all.nl/4tH/ *** Home of the 4tH compiler! *** _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
