EdorFaus wrote: > Darn it. I know, but I was sort of hoping noone would notice (or at > least not care/comment about) that. ^_^'
Hehe ;-) > Now that I think about it though, I guess wikis are really more > about letting everyone change stuff, and then just revert the change > if it was wrong, instead of having to approve every change... Well, I think that, if the repo was protected against history rewrites, one may very well leave it open. > ... Although, hm. A bit of looking around shows that CC-BY-SA is not > compatible with the GNU GPL. Ah, what's the problem ? > P.S. Things would be *so* much simpler if only everyone could use > CC0 instead of all these other licenses... Fat chance of that > happening though. Well, one of the practical consequences of the GPL is that many of those embedded Linux systems are quite hackable, because the manufacturer is required to make at least the basics available. Without this requirement, almost nobody would do that. It may not even be so much that they'd begrudge us the fun of hacking their devices but more risk aversion in their legal department - the less one can see, the smaller your legal attack surface. - Werner _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
