So with this the CPU is a card that can be constantly upgraded? If that's
the case, is it only the CPU, or are other parts (RAM, storage, etc) able
to be replaced too? Basically, is it a CPU in the traditional sense, or an
SoC card? Either way, I'm excited.
On Aug 29, 2014 10:58 AM, "Paul Boddie" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Friday 29. August 2014 15.34.38 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighon wrote:
> >
> >  i think it was only very very recently that ingenic licensed mips!  they
> >  have a completely independent implementation (MIPS-compliant) and
> >  i cannot see a chinese company taking orders from a US-based
> >  corporation any time soon :)
>
> Or even a UK-based one. As long as the PowerVR stuff isn't stuffed into
> what
> they're producing, they might still have some interesting products.
>
> >  i've been speaking on and off with ingenic and they seem to have learned
> >  the lesson not to use proprietary non-chinese software libraries and
> >  hard macros (e.g. the vivante VPU / GPU), which is great.
>
> Indeed.
>
> [...]
>
> >  um, yes it would :)  and, if you look hard enough, you can find GPL'd
> >  schematics to create your own CPU Card later, i will be happy to
> >  issue a royalty-free license for Open Hardware designs (yeees it
> >  does have to be licensed, and yeees, it does have to be verified
> >  as compliant because there is the risk of incorrect implementations
> >  causing actual physical harm if there are short-circuits for example)
>
> My advice would be to try and adopt an existing licence and to be as
> transparent and, at the same time, as non-threatening as possible. I think
> people have seen various scary statements made over the years and have thus
> probably steered clear of the initiative until now, but if you could put
> everyone at ease about the licensing, I think people would be a bit more
> eager
> to get involved.
>
> I know that the initiative has produced working hardware - or that's my
> impression from various mailing list messages - but I don't think many
> people
> are aware of that, and they maybe don't hang around for long enough to
> discover it, either. Getting people to go with what you're doing rather
> than
> some random (and potentially non-delivering) Kickstarter is fairly
> important,
> but I doubt you need me to tell you that. :-)
>
> >  so, you could start with a 2 or 4 layer PCB doing a redesign to the
> >  ben - very simple - and then never have to redesign the base, or
> >  the casework, ever again [unless components go EOL]...
> >
> >  ... just do a new CPU card and the new Ben will always be "current".
> >  individuals may also choose, instead of throwing the old CPU card
> >  away as e-waste, to recycle it downstream.
> >
> >  lots of benefits to EOMA68.
>
> I agree with all this. Given that I have yet to get into PCB design, "you"
> in
> the above will have to mean "people". ;-)
>
> > >  what happened
> > >
> > > to those people who wanted to use the EOMA68 stuff in a portable games
> > > console? Did they get beyond the CAD models for the casing?
> >
> >  yes.  their PCB designer quit so they found another couple of people.
> > manuel is, amazingly, despite the delays, patiently committed to making
> an
> > EOMA68 games console.
> >
> >  i even offered to do the PCB for him but he wants to encourage people to
> >  do it using KiCAD.
>
> Well, I think there are virtues in using freely available tools. I pay some
> attention to various retrocomputing communities, and KiCAD appears to be
> taken
> more seriously in those communities now, amongst people who would otherwise
> just use whatever proprietary stuff they happen to have access to. When
> people
> need to collaborate, they quickly find that using proprietary tools
> excludes
> or burdens potential collaborators, and there's a wider appreciation of
> such
> issues now.
>
> [...]
>
> >  yes.  pay day soon so i will negotiate with a prototyping company, find
> >  out pricing for 5 samples and get them started probably.... within 2
> > weeks.
>
> It's nice to see things progressing again. And I admire your perseverance
> and
> continued enthusiasm for the initiative. :-)
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Hardware Discussion List
> Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to