I know it isn't coming any time soon. I've been waiting nearly five years, staying on the mailing list 'just in case.' As things are now, I have moved on in many ways - when I started out with my NanoNote I was a university student who was after a geeky project to get absorbed into. I did that, and eventually my NanoNote died, and the support behind it with it. Now I'm an honours graduate with a fiancée and prospects of a career as a fantasy author. Maybe it's time to 'put away childish things.'
As for Anelok - I neither know now particularly care what it is or what it's for. Maybe I will unsubscribe from the list. Maybe one day, if I ever have the money behind me, I'll take a more active part in developing the successor project. Mark. On 19 April 2015 at 19:45, Bas Wijnen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Mark Tuson wrote: > > I've been a member of this list for something like five years; I > > joined following my purchase of a Ben NanoNote, thinking it might he > > useful to be a member of the community. Help and be helped, and all > > that. > > I think this is what the list was intended for, but as you noticed it > moved in a different direction. > > > So, I ask, was the whole NanoNote thing a flash-in-the-pan episode > > of wishful thinking? Or was it a real project that simply fizzled > > out? > > I can't answer this question. AFAIK Wolfgang was the driving force > behind it, and he silently disappeared (or at least, I didn't see him > leave, he just never posts on the list anymore). > > I believe he meant to produce the next versions. I don't know why it > didn't work out. > > > Last time I asked about it I was told something like 'they > > tried and you're evil for not appreciating the effort that's gone > > into this,' but that's not really a helpful answer. > > The first half is true, they did try. Asking what happened is not evil, > of course. > > > Is there a point in me still waiting on this mailing list to see if > > anyone's going to pull their finger out and make the damned thing, or > > what? > > You never know what'll happen, but as far as I know, you shouldn't be > waiting for it. Nobody is working on it, I think, and nobody is even > thinking of working on it. > > > The actual reason why I'm writing to you like this is that since the > > project fizzled out to nothing, I've been a member of this list, > > waiting to see what was going to happen, and in the meantime I've > > been constantly bombarded with emails from the list, talking about > > projects I don't care two sugarlumps about. > > You're talking about Anelok, I suppose? I really like those mails. > It's a completely different project, and I'm not sure if I would like to > have one. But I very much enjoy following the process of developing an > open hardware device. > > However, if you don't, I would suggest that you unsubscribe from the > list. The next version of the NanoNote is not coming anytime soon, it > probably isn't coming ever. > > Thanks, > Bas > > _______________________________________________ > Qi Hardware Discussion List > Mail to list (members only): [email protected] > Subscribe or Unsubscribe: > http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

