It's even worse than that: Uber's self-driving fleet <http://readwrite.com/2016/12/15/uber-at-odds-with-the-california-department-of-motor-vehicles-tl4/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=RWW&utm_content=Uber+told+to+pull+over+self-driving+fleet+by+California%27s+DMV>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Carsten Agger <[email protected]> wrote: > Yesterday, I received a LinkedIn email from a talent scout at Uber asking > if I'd like to work on their core infrastructure. > > My reply: > > "Thanks for reaching out, but this is not something I am interested in. A > bit on principle, as I won't work with Uber on the grounds that > > * their apps are not free software > > * I don't sympathize with their undermining of the taxi business, > replacing trained and insured drivers with what is effectively what used to > be called "pirate taxis" paying "app taxes" to an American company. > > All the best to you too, > (signed)" > > The first reason is really sufficient as I won't work with proprietary > software if I can help it (and right now I can, thankfully), but the second > would also be sufficient in itself if their app *were* free software. > > Best > > Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion > >
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
