On 26/07/17 10:42, Max Mehl wrote: > # Jonas Oberg [2017-07-26 11:27 +0200]: >>> Good point but not easy to answer. All services can be viewed with a >>> Free Software browser but e.g. Facebook tries to convince you of >>> downloading the non-free Messenger app (you cannot even write FB >>> messages on your mobile browser anymore IIRC). LibreJS may also warn >>> its >>> users with most of these services' sites. Is this already Free Software >>> unfriendly? >> >> If there's a way to connect to the service with Free Software and it >> gives >> you access to the features the service offers, then that's fine for >> me, as >> long as it's not overly burdensome to do so. I know, it's not a black >> and >> white :-) > > You convinced me :) > > So in this case, the sentence under the social sharing buttons would be: > > Some services harm your privacy. [Learn more]. > > Anything to add? If not, I'd make the change soon. > > Best, > Max > If a service is harming my privacy, but also restricting me by forcing the use of a specific piece of software (which is non free) surely that is also harming my freedom of choice, so perhaps
Some services harm your privacy. [Learn more] and in some cases also harm freedom [learn more] You cover 2 areas there, Paul -- Paul Sutton http://www.zleap.net Next Torbay Tech Jam - August 12th 2017 _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
