Hi all, «Without that evidentiary basis, there's no way to know you need self-help measures, nor is there any way to convince regulators to take action,»
Cory Doctorow nice article (as usual) https://boingboing.net/2017/11/25/la-la-la-cant-hear-you.html explains us why Yale Privacy Lab [1] and Exodus Privacy [2] **cannot** give the world scietific evidences that similar spyware is **likely** (there are rumors) also distributed in similar iOS apps «iOS is DRM-locked and it's a felony -- punishable by a 5-year prison sentence and a $500,000 fine for a first offense in the USA under DMCA 1201, and similar provisions of Article 6 of the EUCD in France where Exodus is located -- to distribute tools that bypass this DRM, even for the essential work of discovering whether billions of people are at risk due to covert spying from the platform.» I believe this is another strong evidence to offer to the EU Council and Parliament to review EUCD and never again permit _code_ like DRM to **becomethe judge** of what can and cannot be done with digital works
could be this one oincluded in a _curated_ section of "evidences" in http://drm.info ? ciao Giovanni [1] https://privacylab.yale.edu/ [2] https://exodus-privacy.eu.org/ reports for many apps: https://reports.exodus-privacy.eu.org/ -- Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera - IT infrastructures http://xelera.eu/contact-us/ **per favore** Quota Bene: http://wiki.news.nic.it/QuotarBene **please** use Inline Reply: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
