On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:09:34PM -0200, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > > I think you're speculating. Please state clearly what parts should be > > patched (it's GPL software!). > > I have started a detailed review in [1]. Discourse has a revision > currently approved in the FSD (from 2015, according to the page's > history), but this was long before the JavaScript trap article (and > issues pointed there) came to exist. > > Anyways, in [1] there is shown the output of LibreJS in a demo instance > of Discourse. There is also a more detailed evaluation in a posterior > section, but only raw results are there (no cleaning was made so far). >
Hi Adonay, thanks for taking this up! So what does it say? AFAIK it seems that LibreJS fails to recognize a number of Brotli-compressed assets. But I see no non-free code over there. What would help LibreJS to go green? I guess some licensing tag in the HTML would help it, but apart from that I see no reason to change the FSD approval: do you see any? > > Well, the good thing with Discourse is that you can use it by email > > when it's properly setup to do so. > > I hope it's not one of those no-reply emails. ;) > The From: email address is configurable, so you can use a no-reply email. Actually I came to create a private category for Staff and assign it the 'no-reply' address, so that any reply comes to that as a new topic ; you may also assign the address to a group so it becomes like a support email. == hk -- P.S.: Awakening Territories to Life == <https://ps.zoethical.com/> == GPG ID == 4CE6 4F27 9931 0403 A903 E43F 0B14 96B7 E336 03EB == _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
