On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:09:34PM -0200, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> > I think you're speculating. Please state clearly what parts should be
> > patched (it's GPL software!).
> 
> I have started a detailed review in [1]. Discourse has a revision
> currently approved in the FSD (from 2015, according to the page's
> history), but this was long before the JavaScript trap article (and
> issues pointed there) came to exist.
> 
> Anyways, in [1] there is shown the output of LibreJS in a demo instance
> of Discourse. There is also a more detailed evaluation in a posterior
> section, but only raw results are there (no cleaning was made so far).
>

Hi Adonay, thanks for taking this up!

So what does it say? AFAIK it seems that LibreJS fails to recognize a
number of Brotli-compressed assets. But I see no non-free code over
there. What would help LibreJS to go green? I guess some licensing tag
in the HTML would help it, but apart from that I see no reason to
change the FSD approval: do you see any?

> > Well, the good thing with Discourse is that you can use it by email
> > when it's properly setup to do so.
> 
> I hope it's not one of those no-reply emails. ;)
>

The From: email address is configurable, so you can use a no-reply
email. Actually I came to create a private category for Staff and
assign it the 'no-reply' address, so that any reply comes to that as a
new topic ; you may also assign the address to a group so it becomes
like a support email.

==
hk

-- 
P.S.: Awakening Territories to Life == <https://ps.zoethical.com/> ==
      GPG ID == 4CE6 4F27 9931 0403 A903  E43F 0B14 96B7 E336 03EB ==
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to