> This is kind of problematic. > > In organization management --- not specific to "business" ---, > particularly involving descentralized organizations with different > managers each, this creates communication noise or action > inconsistency. Of course each continent has its own culture, but I fail > to see in European culture where having accounts in such centralized > non-standardized full-of-JS-or-non-free-JS social network sites is > considered a must.
To make my point clear: although it's not acceptable in the long-term, I'm OK with other people ([1]) spreading the word about our actions in Facebook, I can't speak for the FSF, but I think even the FSF sees this as undesirable in long-term but acceptable when thinking about short-term visibility --- to know why I came to this consideration about FSF, open any news item in fsf.org, and click on the bold "Share on social networks" link that is in the bottom. [1] "Other people" in this message means: people who are not free/libre software activists. These "other people" can also be only users of free/libre software, but they don't have to be. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
