Dear Daniel, On ĵaŭ, 2018-06-14 at 22:37 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > This statement could create the impression that Daniel Pocock was the > > one vote against the simplification of the membership procedure. > > However, this is not the case. Daniel Pocock did not participate in this > > vote, nor did he participate in the General Assembly altogether (neither > > personally nor by delegation). > > > > Some people may have chosen not to attend the meeting so that it > wouldn't achieve quorum.
That sounds unusually anti-democratic. A staunch democrat votes. > In my case, I actually went out to Albania and Kosovo for free software > events[1] while other FSFE GA members and staff were meeting in Berlin > to remove my position. This sounds more than a little disingenuous. It sounds like you are implying that the GA scarcely go to free software events and/or only had a meeting to vote on a single matter. Both couldn't be further from the truth. I am certain that there is a better platform or way to address these disagreements than what looks like airing dirty laundry in public, though. The CoC mandates that criticism be constructive, and claims like this... > As the last[1] man standing for democracy in FSFE ...don't look the part. I assume you have good intentions, Daniel, and love free software every bit as much as the rest of us, so I want to ask you if your issues can be addressed with the same assumption of good intentions. Yours faithfully, Carmen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
