On 03/05/2019 10:46, Reinhard Müller wrote: > Hi, Paul! > > Am 02.05.19 um 21:45 schrieb Paul Boddie: >> It would obviously have been far more appropriate for Daniel to merely >> advertise that another discussion venue has been set up and for him to >> invite >> those who are interested to sign up for themselves. As far as I know, no >> such >> invitation message has been propagated by this mailing list, but I do wonder >> whether it might have been propagated had it been received. > > From my experience with this mailing list (and others hosted by FSFE), I > would absolutely have expected such an invitation to have been approved > by the list moderators. I see that in the past, two kinds of messages > have been rejected: > > * Messages that contain offensive language, and > * Messages that violate the privacy of others (e.g. forwarding priate > emails). > >> I would also encourage the FSFE leadership to use venues like this list to >> more fully engage with the community, even when this involves encountering >> dissent.
I agree with this. if even small initiatives have the backing of people like the FSFE then that is a good thing. Paul _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct