Am Mittwoch 09 Oktober 2019 10:02:16 schrieb Mirko Boehm: > So let me rephrase this in > simple speech: The FSFE-in-2020 ground to a halt because the decision > makers (our GA and the president) did not prioritise it
They did indeed not, but for good reasons (which you don't seem to agree to, which is fine, though calling an explanation attempt bullshitting is something I don't get.). > and have no interest in the increased accountability and transparency > that would inevitably follow from any sort of modernisation of FSFE. In my point of view it wouldn't follow automatically from modernisation. Also the FSFE-in-2020 process was not aiming for increased accountability and transparency. If a process is taking a path that is not bound to get to the results, I think it is important to modify or stop it. Regards, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
