Hmmm... > I believe, it would be more productive to ask something more specific — > namely, what do you what to achieve. >
Lets say I would like to see if my question was asked and solved cannot as it is at https://t.me/phhtreble >> Many communities get locked behind it and I cannot access anything. > > Locked behind what? If you have not access to a certain ‘community’ (i. e. https://t.me/phhtreble > resource), how do you expect a third-party useragent to help you with that? > just like nitter or bibliogram. > As for (b), many various SaaSʼes exist out there, including some > Telegram-related, but I found it inappropriate to advertise them here. Then do not type here! > > As for (a), I have never heard of one, and I am not surprised of that for > the following reason. https://twitter.com is a modern ‘webapp’ written in a > clean client-server manner, so writing Nitter was a task of writing > alternative frontend for undocumented yet pretty stable API. While > https://t.me is implemented in a more old-school fashion (it is rather akin > to <https://mobile.twitter.com>), which on the one hand makes it perfectly > usable without running ad-hoc javascripts in your browser, but on the other > hand makes writing a client for it an unpleasant task, that requires parsing > an output for humans. > > There is quite a few free clients for non-anonymous Telegram interface, > though, including the official one. > _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
