On 2/10/21 12:39 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: > there's no incentive to even follow a discussion.
Agree that's why i want to define these standards through FSFE in a way that allows public review and contributions ^-^ -- - Krey
OpenPGP_0x31AE4020956E0A9A.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
