On 26/09/2019 23:42, Reinhard Müller wrote: > Am 26.09.19 um 23:30 schrieb Daniel Pocock: >> Thanks for the fast response > > You're welcome. However, pointing out where your statements are > incorrect can be a time-consuming and tiring job, so plese don't be > disappointed if I only follow up on the most extreme cases. >
A little fact: I only paid the absolute minimum contribution to FSFE each year. Even after the Fellowship elected me, my payments were late. By months. Herr Kirschner didn't even need to make conspiracies with Debian to blackmail me into resigning from the representative role because my payment was so late that my membership may have lapsed anyway. Nonetheless, in the minutes[1] of the 2018 annual meeting, FSFE still thanked me. Thank you for doing so, I sincerely appreciate it and if people hadn't maintained the gossip after that, I probably wouldn't have said any more about FSFE since then. Given that RMS has done so much more than me, why didn't FSFE think him too? Why the smug blog post gloating about his demise at the hands of character assassins? Is that an unreasonable thing for me to ask? Will the FSFE GA meeting of 2019 pass a motion thanking RMS for starting the Free Software movement and leading it for the better part of his life? If you feel that thanking the man who /defined/ Free Software is too time-consuming and tiring, how can you accept the money generated by this movement? Regards, Daniel 1. https://fsfe.org/about/legal/minutes/minutes-2018-10-07.en.pdf _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
