On 2019-09-30 02:03 AM, Danny Spitzberg wrote:
Re. “the internet fundamental disagrees with me” — hey, if
you’re talking to the internet, can you please ask it to post the
recording of Bradley Kuhn’s LibrePlanet talk? Information wants to
be free, right?
But seriously, as long as I’m getting double emails about #RiseUp!!1
and so on, I’m on a new list. Re-read the excerpt from the
subscription confirmation e-mail (“ignore this and nothing will
happen”) and you’ll see misinformation in the name of what I’ll
generously call vigilante justice.
I will say it’s that too bad that FSF is in tumult and changed
it’s terms to prevent the occasional murder/execution conspiracy
claim. I guess it’s also entertaining to see so much righteous
indignation and the occasional assassination speculation.
But in practical terms..., I’m glad to see Daniel’s conduct and
this list referred to as spam.
Calling it spam is a bit of a stretch. It's pretty obvious most of the
people on it *WANT* to be on the list. There were more people who
clearly indicated that than not. If it were actual spam you wouldn't be
able to unsubscribe and there wouldn't be a connection to actions you'd
taken. At those whom are claiming it is spam.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 10:36 PM Christopher Waid
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2019-09-30 01:06 AM, Florian Snow wrote:
On September 30, 2019 12:06:37 AM GMT+02:00, Christopher Waid
<[email protected]> wrote:
This is like saying because I setup a new server
That is not what happened.
In any event none of this theoretical chatter
matters much. You are on
the internet and the internet fundamentally
disagrees with you. It's
not the law that matters because the law
differs from place to place and we
are all in different places. It's fundamentally
how the internet works
that matters and the fact you are on two lists
now is evidence of that fact.
According to this, everything that factually happens, is OK.
Of course not. What I was saying was relative to the internet.
Awesome!
So if someone hires a hitman online, only the hitman can be
legally
charged.
If a hitman commits murder than yes- the hitman should be charged.
Spam,
I have no issue with spam. You can't stop it and you agreed to it by
utilizing the very nature of the technology. Anything you do via law
is
through the use of violence and that is morally wrong. Spam isn't
going
to kill you.
DDoS attacks,
Same thing. I'd not encourage it. Nor would I encourage spam.
However it
is part of what you agree to when getting online.
copying data without consent,
I'm not even sure this makes any sense. What is it even mean? A copy
certainly isn't theft. No.
all OK because they factually happen.
Nope. You left out the whole internet part.
If only the real world was like this: We could punch or stab each
other and it would be OK because it happened. Oh, wait, perhaps we
introduced laws to avoid that situation, and perhaps that is also
why
we we live by rules in society that do not depend on laws.
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
