We don't want to speak with people that are not free software purists. As RMS says Debian is a non free distribution so they are traitors. FSFE speaks with traitors as well so they are traitors themselves.
Daniel (one of our heroes) detected that and made clear that there must not be compromise and treason if we want free software world domination! Everyone saying different things is betraying RMS' legacy. -- https://backtotheaugust.org/ Oct 23, 2019, 00:24 by [email protected]: It is time to movepast the controversies and discuss the real issues, the issue of howto be more effective as free software advocates. Traditionally,various organizations advocating for social change have brokenvarious social rules as part of advocating for social change. Internet communitieshave their own social rules about what is allowed to be discussed,and what is off-topic or banned. If one person joins a community andstarts trolling it, they often in the best case get ignored, and inthe worst case just get banned. People go to variousforums and communities to get help when proprietary software has letthem down. Other people use proprietary software and are talkingabout about why they think it is good or useful. Free softwareactivists should go into the enemy territory and post messages aboutwhy xyz piece of proprietary software is bad. They should do so ingroups going into the same community so that it isn’t just one lonevoice who is a troll. Non-technical users do not have to settle forDRM or take it when a proprietary software company takes theirsoftware and community out from under them. Many people hate thesethings but take it with some kind of acceptance, like it is a fact oflife like eating or breathing air. It is not and the proprietarysoftware industry does not have to exist. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
