Hi, I think LibreFunding should not use systems like Disqus that are the epitome of proprietary surveillance options. It will be harder for me to get behind the concept if it has that stuff connected.
Best, Aaron -- Aaron Wolf wolftune.com On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Bastien Guerry <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > I would prefer using a static site generator, because it makes it easy > to open the project to anyone who wants to commit changes. It is also > easier to handle translations. > > Adding comments to static websites with tools like disqus.com is easy > enough -- e.g. that's what I do right now for my own website. > > I don't mind starting with what we have and change later on. We just > need to be careful about comments: we should not advertize the website > until we decide what system we use, otherwise migrating comments will > be to much of a hassle. > > Jarek <[email protected]> writes: > > > I think we should keep Wordpress and migrate to something different > > later if required - there are tools to do that AFAIK. > > Agreed, the decision about this should not block anything for now. > > Thanks for putting the first interview online! > > -- > Bastien > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.librefunding.org/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.librefunding.org/listinfo/discussion
