No. Thats so old it has grey hairs. Scott
On 7/23/05, Jason Brunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running > > 0.69.14 > built on Tue Jul 12 04:11:48 UTC 2005 > > > Is this a version that will do it automatically. > > Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 5:37 PM > To: Jason Brunk > Cc: Chris Buechler; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] spoof mac > > It does it automatically with recent versions. > > On 7/23/05, Jason Brunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right, mine is all f's. any one know where I can get a good random > > generated one? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 3:58 PM > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] spoof mac > > > > On 7/23/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is only for network interfaces that have invalid mac addresses > > > already (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). You can spoof the mac in the respected > > > interface, there is a box for it. There is no way to randomly > > > generate a mac address unless your original address is invalid. > > > > > > > nor would you ever *want* to spoof your MAC address unless you have > > good reason to do so. For hardware that doesn't have a MAC in the > > usual location and ends up with ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, you need to spoof > > one or nothing will work. For the WAN, sometimes you want to spoof > > the MAC of your previous firewall so you don't have to go through any > > crap with your ISP to get switched over to a different machine. > > > > Other than that, there's no good reason to spoof a MAC, and is > > probably more likely to break things than anything. (vendor obscurity > > is not a good reason) > > > > -cmb > > > > > >
