On 9/30/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmmh... I must admin I have some difficuties in following you in your > thoughts... > > On 9/30/05, Travis H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I want to mention that you can also use SOCKS as a proxy. Many > > clients support this non-transparently (as a configuration option), > > and you could maybe even do it transparently. > > A SOCK proxy require a proxy-aware application, and this is not what I want > to achieve. But this is my own desire, so anybody can do what he wants.. I > will not follow the SOCK proxy direction...
Not entirely true. http://www.socks.nec.com/Download/SocksCapDownload/index.asp http://www.freecap.ru/eng/?p=whatis --Bill
