On 10/21/05, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [1] "The last rule that matches a packet will be executed." > I think it would be better if we had shaper rule matching work in the > same way as the firewall rules, ie first match being executed. I think > orthogonality is the word I am looking for, but its been a long time > since university...
Can't do it and use ALTQ (without tying rules directly into the shaper, something we decided we didn't want to do), unless you can figure out a better way. > [2] I have been trying to figure out how the shaper works but its not > happening > :-( I'm not surprised, it's not exactly elegant at this time. I've said this before, the wizard creates correct rules, anything outside of the wizard at this time isn't likely to produce the right rules. I know about the problems, I'm interested in them, but I'm not going to support them until I get the code to a point where I think it'll do the right thing more often than not (right now, it's nearly impossible to "do the right thing"). > When I add a rule I get 2 target queues. Being used to mono I was > expecting just one and do not understand this at all. Why are there 2? > What do they mean? In and out. We queue the traffic on both sides of the firewall. --Bill
