On 3/1/06, Nick Buraglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I started a long reply to this but it still all comes down to > > personal preference so no need to keep this going. Iptables has > > some things that pf by itself doesn't. pf has some things that > > iptables doesn't. Iptables works for me. Pf works for pfsense. > > Its all good. Looks like the original author isn't going to > > release any code just yet so it really doesn't matter anyway. > > Don't misinterpret my comments, I don't disagree. I was simply > stating that, while people may or may not agree as to how you're > feature needs be addressed, this may not be the best venue for making > them since (to my the best of my knowledge) the pfsense doesn't do > any pf level coding.
I've done some, nothing you'll see in pfSense 1.0 however. And only stuff that either can't be done by userland, or enables us to do stuff in userland (layer 7 shaping). --Bill
