Understood. Next month I'll have some free time and will try to sit down and chew through it myself to understand better. Appreciate all your work as-is!
RB On 3/26/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/21/06, Josh Stompro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this would be a great idea, I am also in this boat where I would > > like to shape on more than one interface. I realize it can be done > > manually, but it would be nice if the wizard took care of it. > > > > Is there any more documentation on pfsense's traffic shaping that what > > is listed in the monowall handbook? > > http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/trafficshaper.html > > > > I would like to limit the opt interface to 384kbits up/down and > > guarantee that a certain machine or machine's on the lan side get higher > > priority than anything else, for any traffic they send. Along with the > > Ack rules so that downloads don't kill latency. Since you can only > > shape traffic what is sent on an interface, the Wan queue has to deal > > with limiting traffic coming from opt1, which I don't understand how to > > do yet. > > The code to do this got backed out 9 months ago. It'll be put back in > later after I get positive feedback on the current code. I'm tired of > tracking down shaper bugs and trying to get the simple stuff we have > working right (it should now, but I want to work on other stuff for a > while - I'm kinda burnt out on it). > > --Bill >
