Hi Bill,

Yes I have been using a Download manager leechget www.leechget.net , and I
have been using this one for a few years now. But it has never made that
much difference before.

I downloaded another file last night 3.3Gig and it however did not come in
via both connections and I used the same DL manager and it had the same
amount of connections.

I really can't explain why the difference. But when it works using both
connections, all I can say is its pretty cool to watch it come in that fast.

I have now been using PFSense in a Load Balance capacity now for about a
month and have downloaded many files using Leechget.

However, you may be able to assist me with a Failover DNS. I synced as how
Scott mentioned and the failover DNS worked sort of, but only after
refreshing the page request a couple of times. 

Any thoughts on what I need to do to have this work correctly?

I am experimenting with a DNS server in my network as well but I am not sure
if it should be on the outside of PFSense or can remain behind the firewall.
Any ideas?

Kindest Regards,
 
Craig Roy
Horizon IT Consultants


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 31 March 2006 8:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Outbound load-balancing

On 3/30/06, Craig Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> You are fortunate that your ISP supports aggregate connections. Here in
> Australia, all ISP's don't want to know about it. There attitudes are, if
> you want to go faster, then get a faster connection and pay up to 10 times
> the price.
>
> However, I did download a 600MB files since replying to your email and my
> PFSense did download this file across both connections at the same time.
It
> took me 26minutes to get this file down.
>
> I could see that doth DSL Routers were being hammered quite hard
> simultaneously, and when viewed in the Traffic graphs for WAN and OPT
> interfaces, the bandwidth incoming and outgoing was exactly the same.
>
> I have 2 1.5/256 DSL connections configured as Round Robin, but only on my
> end as I mentioned earlier all ISP's here don't support aggregating. My
good
> fortunate on downloading that large file was most likely something to do
> with the server that I was getting it from, recognising both IP's.

Any chance you're using a download manager?  A number of them will
open up multiple connections to the destination server and request
individual "chunks" of a file.  FWIW, we round robin network flows, so
this would have HAD to use multiple tcp connections to work the way
you are describing.

--Bill

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.384 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/298 - Release Date: 30/03/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.384 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/298 - Release Date: 30/03/2006
 

Reply via email to