-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
That was what I was thinking, and it does present a hurdle to jump if
implementing pftabled.
nb
On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 6/26/06, Nick Buraglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've been thinking about adding pftabled to pfsense but have not had
the time to really do it yet since I'm slow at writing the gui
parts. It's certainly possible to use pftabled to remotely
manipulate a pf table, even via scripts. If I get some time maybe
I'll play with adding it without a gui and see how it works.
FWIW, aliases don't yet use tables. That's something I'm interested
in fixing post 1.0 sometime (maybe I'll get bored at the hackathon and
fix it then :))
--Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEoITAFOm2Sy5bRPQRAnr3AJ0aZLFpTm8q56ZJ4B/L+d+g9SPbeQCePup0
LIEXyiXqLxb2t4mO2KmQmos=
=ZH1r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
