Tommaso Di Donato wrote:
On 10/4/06, Rainer Duffner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At
least in this respect, pfSense is still a clear packet-filter only ;-)
And ideally, it should stay this way while analyzing packet-content
should occur elsewhere (because it also needs much more CPU-power).
Sorry, but I do not agree totally with you: the thing I love with
pfSense is that it is possible to install it everywhere, so it could be
a _real_ competitor to enterprise products (like Cisco ASA). So, I
think that CPU-power should not be a limit.
I agree, I think pfsense devs do a great job. When I need something
more than a packet-filter then I will post a bounty. I would encourage
all those users who request packet-content analysis features to
consider the same.
|
