OK, I know it's possible to upgrade to the latest development snapshot any time, but the point is to use stable version in production environments. For now 1.0.1 is the stable version as far as I know, and it's running on FreeBSD 6.1
May be I'm too conservative, but I don't use Development, alpha or beta versions in production. Releasing the patch for existing version or newer version (1.0.2 for example) would be an acceptable solution. Best regards, Dmitry Quoting Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry but we do not give out firm dates. When it is done is the answer. > > Either way folks can upgrade to the latest version which features > FreeBSD 6.2 from > http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/ so its a moot > point. > > Scott > > > On 2/23/07, Dmitry Sorokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Just wandering if new version based on FreeBSD 6.2 will be released before > > March 11th or a patch of some king will be posted to address this issue. > > > > Please check this thread: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi? > > > fetch=1494952+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2007/freebsd- questions/20070204.freebsd- > > questions > > > > Best regards, > > Dmitry > > > > > > Spam detection software, running on the system "intellinet.ca", has > > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message > > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label > > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > > The administrator of that system for details. > > > > Content preview: Dear Friend, Wonderful download site for your favourite > > ring tones and hello tunes in English, Hindi and All South Indian > > Languages…!!! http://simurl.com/rngtns [...] > > > > Content analysis details: (9.5 points, 5.0 required) > > > > pts rule name description > > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > > 0.0 DK_SIGNED Domain Keys: message has an unverified > signature > > 1.6 DEAR_FRIEND BODY: Dear Friend? That's not very dear! > > 0.1 HTML_90_100 BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML > > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > > 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% > > [score: 1.0000] > > 2.3 HTML_TINY_FONT RAW: body contains 1 or 0-point font > > 0.4 SARE_SPEC_LEO_LINE03a RAW: common Leo body text > > 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org > > 1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS RBL: Envelope sender in whois.rfc-ignorant.org > > 0.2 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist > > [URIs: simurl.com] > > 0.3 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks > > 0.8 MANY_EXCLAMATIONS Subject has many exclamations > > -1.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > > > > > > > > >
