On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Aristedes Maniatis<a...@ish.com.au> wrote: > I've since discovered that our application server doesn't need sessions to > be bound to a particular httpd front-end. So 3 & 4 are not actually required > (although SSL offloading would be convenient simply to reduce the number of > IP addresses we have to configure on each web server). > > That leaves 5. How flexible is pfSense's dead host detection? Instead of a > ping check can we substitute an arbitrary http check (at a minimum to check > for a 200 response, but ideally we want to perform a regex check to find > specific content on a page)? Or alternatively since we already have nagios > performing these checks can we use that to notify pfsense to perform a > failover?
Some of that functionality does exist in relayd, but the implementation in 2.0 hasn't been finished and currently has a number of issues. I'll email you off list on taking this on as a project, we'll find a solution that will meet your needs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
