אני שמח לראות שאתה שומר על המסורת של לקרוא לי "מישהו".
המטרה במעבר לוורדפרס היא לא טכנית אלה ניהולית - אני רוצה לאפשר לאנשים שלא מכירים קוד (ולא צריכים להכיר) לעזור בתחזוקת האתר. ממש לא בא לי להתעסק עם המרה של נתונים למבנה XMLי כדי שיתאים לתבנית שהאתר דורש. במקום ש-linux.org.il יכיל את המידע הכי עדכני יש לנו אתר שלא ממש עומד בדרישה של להוות שער לקהילה ולעסקים בארץ. ולא ממש איכפת לי אם יקח לעוד עוד שניה לעלות, העיקר שהמידע שיוצג יהיה רלוונטי. קפלן On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > recently someone requested me to implement something on > http://www.linux.org.il/ and after I was distracted and explained the > fact that > it is a custom PHP site that parses XML at run-time and converts it to > HTML, > and that there is no apparent need why it should be a dynamic site, he > said he > thinks he'll just install WordPress there and allow people to edit the > site. > > I think it's a bad idea. As opposed to WordPress and similar CMSes, static > XHTML > sites that are generated from templates have the following advantages: > > 1. They are more secure. WordPress had a very bad track record of security > vulnerabilities in the past, and other PHP (see > http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/php/ ) and MySQL (see > http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/mysql/ )-based content > management systems are usually prone to other problems like that. > Please don't focus exclusively on this point. > > 2. They are much more reliable than a dynamic site. A static XHTML site is > generated from templates which is maintained in a version control system > (nowadays it can be a distributed one, where every copy has the entire > history), and can be built and reuploaded at any time. The PHP and MySQL > CMSes > tend to get offline (often permanently - see the links I gave) due to many > problems, and then restoring them is incredibly painful. Some MediaWiki > site > that are now offline are: > > * http://perl.net.au/ > > * http://wiki.perl.org.il/ > > * http://wiki.osdc.org.il/ > > * http://www.iglu.org.il/wiki/ > > 3. They can be made more structured than a CMS that just gives you a big > HTML > editing textarea, where you often have to duplicate markup, or in the case > of > MediaWiki, something much more vile and unstructured. > > 4. They are faster to load and consume less resources than a > server-side-scripted CMS. > > -------------------- > > Naturally, dynamic CMSes have some advantages such as the ability to add > user-generated content, and they might be more friendly to laymen, but > this is > not relevant to http://www.linux.org.il/ which is a static portal. > > If you're looking for a solution that combines some of the best of both > worlds > look at ikiwiki : http://ikiwiki.info/ ; > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikiwiki . > This is a wiki engine that stores its pages as files in a distributed > version > control system. > > Regards, > > Shlomi Fish > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ > What does "Zionism" mean? - http://shlom.in/def-zionism > > No one calls Xena the warrior princess “Zeena” to her face and survives. > Luckily for you, she hasn’t visited the modern day United States yet. > > Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . > _______________________________________________ > Discussions mailing list > [email protected] > http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
_______________________________________________ Discussions mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
