> The displaytag name is very generic and kept only for 
> historic reasons, no? With the refactoring it could be 
> logical to find a more descriptive name, eg. something to do 
> with pager, iterator, sorter or a combination of those?
> 

You are correct in that it's only for historical purposes.  The only
reason it's on SF as "displaytag" rather than "display" is that display
was already taken.

Matt



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
displaytag-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel

Reply via email to