> The displaytag name is very generic and kept only for > historic reasons, no? With the refactoring it could be > logical to find a more descriptive name, eg. something to do > with pager, iterator, sorter or a combination of those? >
You are correct in that it's only for historical purposes. The only reason it's on SF as "displaytag" rather than "display" is that display was already taken. Matt ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel