On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 08:29, Matt Raible wrote:
> Sounds good, here's my votes for naming:
> 
> 0.8.6 or 0.9 - make sure you compile it with JDK 1.3 and get rid of that
> bug we've been seeing.
> 
> For the 1.0 version, I'd use:
> 
> displaytag-1.0a.tld
> displaytag-1.0a-bin.zip
> displaytag-1.0a-bin.tar.gz
> displaytag-1.0a-src.zip
> displaytag-1.0a-src.tar.gz

concur.

Brad

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to