Feature Requests item #683989, was opened at 2003-02-10 16:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by luckynh
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=536616&aid=683989&group_id=73068

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen (ravn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: <display:column format="dd-MMM-yyyy"> needed for date propt

Initial Comment:
We have a need for providing a formatstring for dates
as the default is not good enough.

I have a patch, which I am testing out.  If there is
interest I can upload it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Golden (luckynh)
Date: 2003-10-27 21:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=704330

use a custom decorator:

/*
 * <p>Simple Date Format</p>
 * @author luckynh
 * @version 1.0 $Revision: .0 $ ($Author: luckynh $)
 */
 use a custom decorator:

import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
import org.apache.taglibs.display.ColumnDecorator;

public class ShortDateWrapper extends ColumnDecorator
{
     private SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(
"MM/dd/yyyy" );
     
        public String decorate( Object columnValue )
          {
          Date t = (Date)columnValue;
          return sdf.format( t );
     }
}


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen (ravn)
Date: 2003-08-11 12:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14845

I have now taken the time to merge the changes with the
latest source from CVS, and submit patch 786617.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen (ravn)
Date: 2003-08-07 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14845

I have now tried to upgrade my old source tree to be in
synch with the SF CVS, but Eclipse has some problems with
this.  When this is resolved, I will submit my patch which
is in production use here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen (ravn)
Date: 2003-03-13 21:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14845

I have found that the Wrapper system is noticably slower
than just overriding the toString method.  Unfortunately, I
cannot do this in our scenario (objects come from JDBC).

I hope to have time to prepare the patch this week.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Didier Dubois (didier_dubois)
Date: 2003-03-06 09:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=726985

I resolved the problem doing the following step:
 - using a patch similar to the one posted by scottnsmith. 
This allow null Date comparison
 - Using a bean returning a "Date" object (which is correctly 
compared by Java)
 - Using a DateWrapper for this column that returns the 
formated Date as a String.

HTH.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Didier Dubois (didier_dubois)
Date: 2003-03-05 16:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=726985

YES!

I have the same problem. But further more I need to sort my 
table on this date. Do your pathc support this?

Didier

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matt Raible (mraible)
Date: 2003-02-14 13:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=226669

I've subclassed Date and overridden the toString() method as 
a workaround.  I agreet that adding a format attribute is 
probably a better solution.  Please submit your patch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=536616&aid=683989&group_id=73068


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
displaytag-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel

Reply via email to