On 10/31/03 15:54:30 -0500 Thomas Gourgon wrote:

        I removed the "static" initializer, recompiled and it works fine but
there is no more caching. I understand the motivation behind the "static"
being placed there and it's perfectly logical since once it has been
established that a particular subclass of the Decorator implements an
accessor, there is no reason to re-compute it again. The cache instead of
being keyed by property name should be keyed by the composition of the
subclass of Decorator's name and by the property being accessed. I am
sure there are better alternative solutions, may the community speak.

I'd point out that reflection is much lower overhead in the more recent versions of the VM, so caching may not be needed at all.


A.


-- Adam Sherman Tritus CG Inc +1 (613) 797-6819 http://www.tritus.ca/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
displaytag-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel

Reply via email to