[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DISPL-131?page=comments#action_45200 ] 

fabrizio giustina commented on DISPL-131:
-----------------------------------------

I had a look at the patch by Jean-Baptiste, and it looks good. I was already 
going add an interface which could be used instead of separate parameters.
I will merge that with the current cvs code, trying to adapt the already 
committed patch by David in order to use a PaginatedList implementation 
internally.

> Paging and sorting handled externally - valuelist pattern
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DISPL-131
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DISPL-131
>      Project: DisplayTag
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Paging/Sorting
>     Versions: 1.0 RC2
>     Reporter: fabrizio giustina
>      Fix For: 1.1
>  Attachments: externalSort.zip
>
>
> ====
> imported from sf tracker
> id 950819 
> submitted by Matthew Wilson - mlavwilson
> http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=950819 
> ====
> If you work with large amounts of data a web site using
> this product does not scale well, or in most casese at all.
> I have a sf project:
> http://mlavwilson.sourceforge.net/vlh/. I have
> implemented the ValueList Pattern, and have a few tag
> libs. You have a much richer set of taglibs. If you are
> interested in using the ValueListHandler service as an
> implementation to handel the paging and sorting.. and
> data retrieval. Contact me. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =====
> Date: 2004-09-07 03:52
> Sender: ianbdev
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=461701
> Hello,
> I posted the 872183 request.
> Since then we've come up with an alternate approach.
> See [ 1023387 ] Pagination - use subList instead of iterating 
> all records.
> If this change is implemented then you can implement a List 
> object that overrides the subList method of the List interface.
> This would allow you to limit database/datasource accesses 
> to obtain just the few page records required for the page 
> being displayed.
> No other changes to display tag are required.
> Date: 2004-05-27 15:48
> Sender: smccrory
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=20779
> You're right.  I recommend closing this issue 950819 as well 
> as 951204 as duplicates, then increasing the priority 
> on "master" issue 872183.  I'd also recommend cross-
> referencing 950819 and 951204 from *872183*.  I'd do this 
> for you but I don't think I have permissions to admin issues.
> I'm interested enough in this feature that I might be willing
> to
> help implement it.  Please contact me directly if you're 
> interested.
> Date: 2004-05-27 15:13
> Sender: carlossg
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=792979
> This has been already pointed out in RFE 872183
> Date: 2004-05-15 19:50
> Sender: mlavwilson
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=531802
> Like you mentioned earlier:  My reccomendation is to allow 
> your tag to take both a list and a paging/sorting info.  So 
> instead of:
> <display:table name="sessionScope.test" pagesize="10">
> you would have:
> <display:table name="sessionScope.test" 
> pageInfo="sessionScope.pageInfoBean">
> Where pageInfoBean is an interface.  This would allow allow 
> me to use your great tags without tying the two products 
> together.
> Date: 2004-05-14 04:54
> Sender: smccrory
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=20779
> Sounds good, and please keep it easy to use, i.e. don't make 
> the user create their own ValueList adapters for the most 
> fundamental use of it - providing DisplayTag a partial list and 
> a total (full list) record count.  Thanks in advance - you guys 
> are doing great and really useful work.
> Date: 2004-05-14 00:17
> Sender: fgiustAccepting Donations
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=798060
> after 1.0.
> We'll surely need to enhance displaytag to make it handle 
> partial lists, I will look at the ValueList pattern to implement
> it
> (but only supplying interfaces without any jdbc 
> implementation...)
> Date: 2004-05-11 04:42
> Sender: ralfhauserAccepting Donations
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=266141
> see also
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=536616&aid=9512
> 04&group_id=73068
> Date: 2004-05-11 00:10
> Sender: mlavwilson
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=531802
> "..looked at vlh, and it appears to (at least initially) depend
> on direct JDBC. This wouldn't work in environments that have 
> business and data..." 
> The ValueListService currently ships with only a few adapters, 
> the one you mention is the DefaultDynAdapter 
> (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/mlavwilson/vlh/src/jav
> a/net/mlw/vlh/adapter/dyna/DefaultDynAdapter.java?
> rev=1.3&view=auto).  Like you notice this adapter is just 
> about usesless, because in a real work application you would 
> go through the business layer, which would go to the DAO 
> layer which would go...  This is why the ValueListHandler is 
> designed around the ValueListAdapter 
> (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/mlavwilson/vlh/src/jav
> a/net/mlw/vlh/ValueListAdapter.java?rev=1.2&view=auto).  
> This base class (Should be an interface, i am refactoring that 
> now) can be extended to support any type of data retrieval 
> needed.  
> Another standard Adapter is the DirectoryReaderValueList 
> (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/mlavwilson/vlh/src/jav
> a/net/mlw/vlh/adapter/file/DirectoryReaderValueList.java?
> rev=1.1&view=auto), this adapter returns a ValueList of 
> FileInfo pojos.
> The ValueListService returns a 
>  "ValueList" 
> (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/mlavwilson/vlh/src/jav
> a/net/mlw/vlh/ValueList.java?rev=1.1&view=auto).  A 
> ValueList contains a ValueListInfo 
> (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/mlavwilson/vlh/src/jav
> a/net/mlw/vlh/ValueListInfo.java?rev=1.5&view=auto) which 
> contains the paging and sorting information.  
> "Plus, we 
> would NOT be marrying the visual tier with the persistence 
> technology other than having to write new method(s) to get 
> the total query result count(s)."
> This is the job of the ValueListAdapter i discussed above.
> Does this all make sence?
> Date: 2004-05-10 21:10
> Sender: smccrory
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=20779
> I looked at vlh, and it appears to (at least initially) depend
> on
> direct JDBC. This wouldn't work in environments that have 
> business and data access layer between the view and the 
> persistence tiers. Once you start talking about getting data 
> via SOAP, EJBs, O/R tools, etc. you're up a creek...
> A better approach, I think, would be to provide DisplayTag 
> not just a list (which may be of only part of the complete 
> result set), but also a total record count and the page it's 
> currently on. Then, whenever a user clicks "Next" or a page 
> number, our applications could strip off the number, 
> (beginning row number, etc.) and pass that down to the DAO 
> layer to limit the number of rows returned. Our DAOs might 
> have to bang the DB twice (once to get a total count and 
> another to return the partial set), but I'd imagine this would 
> be much more efficient than returning the whole set. Plus, we 
> would NOT be marrying the visual tier with the persistence 
> technology other than having to write new method(s) to get 
> the total query result count(s).
> Date: 2004-05-10 21:09
> Sender: smccrory
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=20779
> I looked at vlh, and it appears to (at least initially) depend
> on
> direct JDBC. This wouldn't work in environments that have 
> business and data access layer between the view and the 
> persistence tiers. Once you start talking about getting data 
> via SOAP, EJBs, O/R tools, etc. you're up a creek...
> A better approach, I think, would be to provide DisplayTag 
> not just a list (which may be of only part of the complete 
> result set), but also a total record count and the page it's 
> currently on. Then, whenever a user clicks "Next" or a page 
> number, our applications could strip off the number, 
> (beginning row number, etc.) and pass that down to the DAO 
> layer to limit the number of rows returned. Our DAOs might 
> have to bang the DB twice (once to get a total count and 
> another to return the partial set), but I'd imagine this would 
> be much more efficient than returning the whole set. Plus, we 
> would NOT be marrying the visual tier with the persistence 
> technology other than having to write new method(s) to get 
> the total query result count(s).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
displaytag-devel mailing list
displaytag-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel

Reply via email to