[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DISPL-320?page=comments#action_62684 ]
Jeff Sheets commented on DISPL-320: ----------------------------------- I want to fix my example a bit, as I forgot to hide the grouping in col1.... Here is the correct example of what is happening.... Correct 1.0 behavior: Col1 (group="1") Col2 (group="2") Omaha 50 (Omaha hidden) (50 here is hidden by grouping) (Omaha hidden) 23 (Omaha hidden) 22 Chicago 22 (22 here is shown because col1 changed values) (Chicago hidden) (22 here is hidden by grouping) (Chicago hidden) 42 (Chicago hidden) 43 Incorrect behavior occurring in displaytag 1.1: Col1 (group="1") Col2 (group="2") Omaha 50 (Omaha hidden) (50 here is hidden by grouping) (Omaha hidden) 23 (Omaha hidden) 22 Chicago (22 here is incorrectly hidden even though col1 changed values) (Chicago hidden) (22 here is hidden by grouping) (Chicago hidden) 42 (Chicago hidden) 43 > Multiple group levels on column are broken > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: DISPL-320 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DISPL-320 > Project: DisplayTag > Type: Bug > Versions: 1.1 > Reporter: Jeff Sheets > Fix For: 1.1.1 > > > We have recently upgraded from 1.0 to 1.1 version of displaytag. Previously > we could define column1 with group="1" and column2 with group="2" so that our > grouping would have levels. When column1 changed groupings it would cause > column2 to change, column2 could have multiple groupings for each group in > column1. > This is better explained in the displaytag reference doc for group: > "The grouping level (starting at 1 and incrementing) of this column > (indicates if successive contain the same values, then they should not be > displayed). The level indicates that if a lower level no longer matches, then > the matching for this higher level should start over as well. If this > attribute is not included, then no grouping is performed." > This behavior is broken in 1.1, as the levels are not respected. col2 is > grouping even when col1 is not. Here is an attempt at an example: > Correct 1.0 behavior: > Col1 (group="1") Col2 (group="2") > Omaha 50 > Omaha (50 here is hidden by grouping) > Omaha 23 > Omaha 22 > Chicago 22 (22 here is shown because col1 changed > values) > Chicago (22 here is hidden by grouping) > Chicago 42 > Chicago 43 > Incorrect behavior occurring in displaytag 1.1: > Col1 (group="1") Col2 (group="2") > Omaha 50 > Omaha (50 here is hidden by grouping) > Omaha 23 > Omaha 22 > Chicago (22 here is incorrectly hidden even > though col1 changed values) > Chicago (22 here is hidden by grouping) > Chicago 42 > Chicago 43 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list displaytag-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
